Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
projects:fluke8840a:esp32 [2017/09/12 03:24]
Louis Mamakos
projects:fluke8840a:esp32 [2017/09/12 03:38] (current)
Louis Mamakos
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 It makes sense to implement a site for a "​bare"​ ESP32 module to be surface mounted, rather than a development module in a DIP form-factor with USB/serial adapter, power regulation and the like. It makes sense to implement a site for a "​bare"​ ESP32 module to be surface mounted, rather than a development module in a DIP form-factor with USB/serial adapter, power regulation and the like.
 +
 +Have large plated-through "​vias"​ below thermal pad of ESP32-WROOM module to solder to ground plane for head dissipation.
  
 The ESP32 would be logically a slave to the STM32F407 control processor which would be primarily interfacing with the Fluke 8840A internals. The ESP32 would be logically a slave to the STM32F407 control processor which would be primarily interfacing with the Fluke 8840A internals.